Practical question of the legality of the Rev

Practical question of the legality of the Rev

1857.

3rd.-The latest last anniversary out-of Judge “Crown and you will Anchor” An excellent.O.F. ended up being prominent by the a food in the Buddy. Franklin’s, Hall Quay. Mr. C. B. Dashwood filled brand new sofa, therefore is reported that this new Legal then contains ninety users.

The month of january

Messrs. Charles J. Palmer, B. Fenn, Rev. H. Squire, Dumbleton, R. Roentgen. B. Norman, Burton, and J. Bayly got elected the fresh new people in the public Library Panel.

p. 207 One’s body out of an excellent whale, that was removed in the Winterton, was being demonstrated towards the Chapel Ordinary.

The newest Rev. W. D. Go, the newest minister off St. Mary’s, Southtown, had, before leaving Southsea, already been presented with a handbag away from ?61.

21st.-The fresh new “Sisters” got within the accident having one of many stone piers regarding the newest Connection, which it had most damaged.

Feb. last.-An Anti-Income tax appointment ended up being held within City Hallway. Brand new Mayor presided, additionally the adopting the took part in what is going on:-Messrs. George Danby-Palmer, Bradbeer, Garson Blake, W. Livingston, S. B. Cory, Roentgen. Hammond, J. Clowes, J. H. Harrison, J. Rivett and J. Fiddes. Mr. S. Bradbeer appeared to be the fresh mover in this matter.

Feb. twenty-first.-A good “Poor’s Price” conference had been held at the Masonic Hall. Mr. W. Livingston presided, and you will an answer protesting from the 1s. 6d. every quarter speed is actually used. Messrs J. Rivett, Joseph Neave, Regal, Roentgen. Bailey, Nichols, and you will F. Starling talked about them, because perform of one’s Guardians is defended by the Mr. J. H. Harrison, among the many Board.

Feb. 25th.-An incident and this delighted considerable notice, was actually heard on County Court, Tolhouse-hallway, before the Court (T. J. Birch, Esq.) New plaintiff try Mr. John Cobb, leather-based provider, getting whom Mr. C. H. Chamberlin featured; the latest defendants was basically Messrs. W. N. Burroughs and you can Grams. D. Palmer, who had been portrayed because of the Mr. J. L. Cufaude. The latest plaintiff stated that he was a candidate on place of work away from Councillor to the elizabeth particularly from the solicitation regarding Messrs. W. Letter. Burroughs and you will Grams. D. Palmer. At that time he turned into a candidate the guy distinctly informed them that he won’t pay of his own pouch way more than ?ten on the costs of one’s election, therefore was knew that Liberal party, to which he belonged, do join the remainder. The night time through to the election he received an offer off just what the expense was basically apt to be, plus in results of that he immediately saw each other Mr. Burroughs and you will Mr. Grams. D. Palmer. You to imagine, he thought, amounted so you’re able to on the ?45, due to the fact memberships altogether amounted so you can but ?42. Just after particular talk they provided to hold him innocuous of quantity of the costs which may go beyond the sum of the signed up, and he and you may Mr. Burroughs upcoming went p. 208 on the meeting Bremen ladies Panel-place of your North-ward, where Mr. Burroughs said they’d made agreements because of their friend John Cobb effective the marketplace-ward. The costs of election, he (the latest plaintiff) forgotten, amounted entirely to help you ?58 1s. 7d. The balance, therefore, he now stated regarding defendants was ?16 1s. 7d.-This new plaintiff, in mix-examination from the Mr. Cufaude, accepted one ?39 of the whole number try to possess – -.-Mr. Cufaude argued when, because the plaintiff mentioned, this new defendants got provided your a vow on surplus expenditures, new make sure should can be found in writing. And, of course, if the data is true, and this, although not, he debated, it was hopeless into the plaintiff to recover, inasmuch when he himself got allowed you to definitely a corner out of the full expenses is to have – -, that was an unlawful operate.-Mr. Chamberlin debated that plaintiff, immediately following choosing the fresh pledge from the defendants, acted merely on the faith of that pledge, hence for this reason, as they had entered up on an involvement to expend the money, these people were accountable. The bucks, moreover, wasn’t spent from the plaintiff, but by panel appointed in order to perform the latest election, and you may till the election is more than, the new plaintiff was not aware all currency had started spent within the – -.-His Honor told you it was clear brand new make certain have to have become written down. He was away from thoughts, and additionally, the plaintiff wasn’t bound to pay the illegal costs, and consequently he may maybe not promote their step for money which he stated.-The newest plaintiff try, consequently, non-ideal.

Leave a Reply