Matrimony agreements would often suggest the period of time for the hence amarriage ought to have taken put
1. Yet, within the family history, everyone knowthat for every rule there is an exception to this rule. A beneficial vexing section ofgenealogy would be the fact no body most understands exactly how to apply the newest exceptions orrules which have one definitive adjective like always, possibly, most likely,likely, etcetera. It might be interesting if there most other instances ofjointures becoming made annually or two shortly after a well-known matrimony big date.
dos. Could there be an extant dispensation to the matrimony of ElizabethClifford and Sir Ralph Bowes who have been third cousins via Henry Fitzhugh,third Lord Fitzhugh or fourth cousins, immediately following removed from the latest fifth LordClifford? That would narrow down their wedding day.
Arthur
Allegedly, when the a dispensation try found and you may granted, it would havebeen because of the among pursuing the, and may even come in the brand new correspondingregister guide, whether or not it survives:
Thomas Savage, Archbishop out of York 1501-1507Christopher Bainbridge, Bishop of Durham 1507-1508, Archbishop off York1508-1514William Senhouse, Bishop out of Durham 1502-1505Thomas Ruthall, Bishop out of Durham 1509-1523Richard Leyburn, Bishop regarding Carlisle 1502-1508John Penny, Bishop from Carlisle 1509-1520
5. If your 10th Lord Clifford do get married in early 1487 [state January] andhas Elizabeth later on where seasons, does the latest chronology maybe not performs?
John fingers?
Age created in later 1487, Henry created during the 1488/nine, Joan from inside the ,etcetera. filling out the latest labels of one’s upload from . In the event that (a) thechronology nonetheless functions; and you will (b) her matrimony piece was not lower; thenwe have only the brand new 1505 pedigree away from Henry VII’s that is inside the oppositionto new conjecture one to she try a valid daughter. (more…)
